Definition & calculation
Count unique individuals reached through direct explosive ordnance risk education sessions and community outreach during the reporting period, deduplicating repeat participants.
Means of verification
EORE session attendance records, outreach logs, digital/mass-media reach estimates
Interpretation
Direction: Higher is better
Typical reporting frequency: Monthly or quarterly
Guidance & common pitfalls
Report direct (face-to-face) reach separately from indirect mass-media estimates to avoid overstating coverage.
This library is a curated reference to adapt, aligned generically with recognised humanitarian frameworks (Sphere, cluster registries, IASC, CHS and others). It is not an official indicator registry — always use the exact indicator definitions your donor or cluster requires.
Related indicators
- Percentage of children in case management showing improved psychosocial wellbeing
- Percentage of explosive ordnance risk education participants demonstrating safe behaviours and knowledge at follow-up
- Percentage of protection service users who report being treated with respect and dignity by staff
- Percentage of referred protection cases confirmed to have accessed the service they were referred to